Psychics and Paranormal Investigations

Within the world of paranormal investigation, few topics generate as much discussion as the role of psychics and individuals who claim to possess paranormal “abilities.” Television programs, documentaries, and online investigations often feature psychic mediums who claim to sense spirits, read residual energy, or communicate with unseen entities. While this approach can certainly add drama and intrigue to an investigation, it also raises important questions about reliability, objectivity, and the overall impact these individuals may have on the investigative process.

Before going any further, it is important to state clearly that this article reflects one investigator’s opinion, formed through years of experience in the field. I do believe that there are individuals who possess heightened sensitivities or abilities that allow them to perceive things others may not. Human perception is complex, and it is entirely possible that certain people are more attuned to emotional or environmental changes around them. In fact, over the years I believe I have met a few individuals whose abilities appeared genuine.

However, acknowledging that such abilities may exist does not necessarily mean they belong within the structured environment of a paranormal investigation.

A well-conducted paranormal investigation should rely on observation, environmental awareness, and the documentation of measurable data. Investigators typically use equipment such as EMF meters, digital audio recorders, temperature sensors, and thermal imaging cameras to detect and record environmental changes that can later be analysed. These tools allow investigators to review potential evidence objectively after an investigation has concluded.

Psychic impressions, by contrast, are subjective experiences. They cannot easily be measured, repeated, or independently verified, which makes them extremely difficult to treat as reliable evidence.

There is also the issue of influence. When a psychic claims that a particular area is active or that a certain spirit is present, it can unintentionally guide the focus of the entire team. Investigators may begin looking for evidence that supports the psychic’s claim, sometimes without realising it. This is a classic example of confirmation bias, where normal environmental factors—such as structural noises, drafts, or electrical interference—are interpreted as paranormal activity.

In my own experience, the influence of these claims can sometimes go even further.

On one investigation, we worked alongside a self-professed witch who suddenly announced that there was a demon sitting on top of a shelf in the room we were investigating. Several newer members of the team immediately reacted to the statement, and within minutes the atmosphere shifted dramatically. What followed was a mild hysteria within the group, which completely disrupted the investigation and diverted attention away from objective observation.

For a short time, we worked alongside a self-professed medium whose claims later came into question when it became known that he suffered from schizophrenia and were undergoing medical treatment. This obviously raised serious concerns about the reliability of anything that had been said during any of our investigations.

Experiences like these highlight how easily suggestion can influence both investigators and witnesses during an investigation.

For these reasons, many investigators choose to keep psychic input separate from the formal investigative process. Psychic impressions may still be heard and considered as personal perspectives, but they are usually treated as subjective interpretations rather than evidence.

To reiterate, I do believe that there may be individuals with genuine abilities. However, based on my own experience in the field, I personally do not believe those abilities have a place within the structure of a paranormal investigation.

Maintaining objectivity, documenting measurable environmental changes, and carefully analysing evidence remain the most reliable ways to approach unexplained phenomena.

And in the end, that is what investigating is really about—seeking understanding, not reinforcing belief.